Friday, September 26, 2014

Were the Dark Ages really "Dark"?

Using the documents we will try to answer the historical question below.  You will need to collect 2 or 3 facts (evidence) from each document and use these as evidence to support your claim.
 
 
Was the time period between 400 AD and 1400 AD a “Dark Age” for Europe?

Was this a time of cultural decay and decline?





Documents and questions



Monday, September 22, 2014

Europe in the Middle Ages

Following the division of the Roman Empire, the eastern part (Byzantine Empire) flourished.  What happened to the western half?

Read the pages 28 - 50 in your textbook.

What was Western Europe like after the fall of the Western Roman Empire?
Who were the Germanic tribes?  How did they govern their kingdoms?

Who was Charlemagne? 
If his kingdom fell apart after his death, why is he so important?

What is feudalism?  Define the terms on page 33.

This time period is sometimes called the "Dark Ages".  Why?
Was the time period truly "dark"?

 
 
 
 
For more information on the Middle Ages...Middle Ages

Thursday, September 18, 2014

Byzantine Empire

Using your textbook...pages 96 - 101

You and a partner will create a "newspaper" to show how the Byzantine Empire grew while Western Rome collapsed.

Use the Bold headings as your "headlines". 
You will need to write a story for each headline and create an illustration to go with the story.

You may have up to 3 people in your group...but all must work.

The Terms, People and Places in your text book MUST be included and highlighted.  (page 96)

Friday, September 12, 2014

Roman Empire

Define the following:
plebeian
patrician
republic
Pax Romana

Instructions for Sept. 16, 17
Storyboard:  Research the growth of Rome from city to Republic, Republic to Empire, Empire to the Fall of Rome.  How would you tell the story.




Rome...Republic to Empire

Crash Course Rome



What is the importance of Christianity?

Crash Course Christianity


What brought about the fall of Rome?

Crash Course Fall of Rome

Wednesday, September 10, 2014

The Persians & Greeks: Crash Course World History #5


Ancient Greece

Today we will look at what we remember about the Ancient Greeks.
We will use page 16 and 17.

Minoans
Mycenaeans
Homer
Iliad and Odyssey
city-state
polis
acropolis
aristocracy
monarchy
democracy (direct)
oligarchy


Golden Age
Philosophers
Architecture


Athens and Sparta


How many Persians were at the Battle of Thermopylae?





Using the documents, fill out the Graphic Organizer.  Then decide on your final claim.  How many do YOU think were there?  You MUST use historical evidence to support your claim.



Document C: Ernle Bradford
Ernle Bradford is an English historian specializing in the ancient
Mediterranean world. The following is an excerpt from his book
The Year of Thermopylae, published in 1980.




Although it is true that Herodotus . . . had access to all the records
available, it is impossible to accept the figures that he gives for
the size of the Persian army and of the fleet. . . .
General Sir Frederick Maurice, who had the opportunity of
covering the area of the march of the Great King not long after the
First World War, came up with the conclusion that the total of the
Persian army was about 210,000. Unlike most desk-bound
scholars he [Maurice] had the opportunity to travel the whole
area, and had excellent military and logistical knowledge of the
terrain. He based his conclusion particularly on his observation of
the water supplies available. . . . It seems that there is no
possibility of the army of Xerxes having exceeded 250,000 men.
Even this number . . . would have been sufficient to exhaust the
water resources at a number of places along their route.
Source: Ernle Bradford, The Year of Thermopylae, 1980, p. 34.


Document D: Rupert Matthews
  
Rupert Matthews is an English author and politician. He has

written over 200 books on history. The following is an excerpt
 
 

from his book The Battle of Thermopylae: A Campaign in Context,

published in 2006.
 
  
No aspect of the Thermopylae campaign has given rise to greater
controversy than the size and composition of the army led by
Xerxes into Greece. . . .

. . . Herodotus puts the strength of Xerxes’ army at around two
million men and says that they drank the rivers dry as they
advanced. . . . As usual, Herodotus does not tell us where he got
this information from, but it does bear all the hallmarks of being an
official document. . . . Whatever the source of information given
by Herodotus, it is quite clear that the list is not an accurate
record of the army Xerxes led into Greece. It would have been
physically impossible to march that many men along the roads
available to them and keep them supplied.

We know that Xerxes sent an advance guard of laborers and
engineers forward to prepare the route for his invasion. . . . While
it is not recorded exactly what these men did, it is clear that they
were undertaking construction work that would aid the army. If
streams were dammed to create reservoirs of water, Xerxes
would have been able to move an army considerably larger than
 
the 210,000 men that General Maurice [see Document C] thoughtthe land could support. Even so, it is unlikely that the increase
could have been more than around 50%, say a total of 300,000 to
350,000.
 

Source: Rupert Matthews, The Battle of Thermopylae: A

Campaign in Context, 2006, p. 10-15.